The
sinking of the US warship the Maine in February was a
turning point in the conflict; and articles alluding to
Spain’s culpability appeared in The New York World
and The New York Journal; however, the Irish
editors were sceptical about Spain’s role in the disaster.
Ford remained convinced of English involvement in the
campaign to discredit Spain and the Irish World
quoted another article from The London Spectator
that cites unrest in the Americas and defined the US as
primarily Anglo.
The difficulties with Spain only served to increase
latent sentiment essential to the unity existing among
Anglo-Saxons. The possibility that the Spanish quarrel
may bring them face to face with a continental coalition
made the Americans realize that our race is not beloved
on the Continent and that we may some day have to make
a common cause. (26 March 1898)
In
“England helped Spain go Broke” (21 March 1898), The
Irish-American also suggests ongoing concerns about
English participation. However, supporting the Spanish
and complete abstention from the war would have been perceived
as unpatriotic. As a result the articles printed in the
Irish-American (and to some extent the Irish
World as well) changed their anti-war tone. On 24 February
the Irish-American published this opinion.
Until the result of an official inquiry is known,
the proper thing, therefore, for everyone, is to keep
cool and rest in the assurance that full justice will
be insisted on by the President and congress. It would
be premature to attempt to pronounce any judgment as to
whether the terrible event was the result of an accident,
or an act for which, in any way, the Spanish authorities
can be held responsible. Should the latter prove to be
the case, in the present state of feeling in the United
States, war between the two countries would be inevitable.
On
2 April, a small article appeared in the Irish World
that made a more subtle argument that defended the United
States without criticising Spain.
The United States has always been most reasonable
in its relations and dealings with other nations and it
needs but plain and honest dealings on the side of Spain
to have the present unpleasantness reach a satisfactory
conclusion for both. The United States is neither a bully
nor a grabbing nation.
At
this point, the writer still has faith in the US legal
system and believes that US and Spanish diplomats can
solve the conflict.
Dunne’s
Mr. Dooley also provided his opinion on the idea of ‘The
Anglo-Saxon Race’ and the Anglicisation of the US in his
column entitled On the Anglo-Saxon. He tells
his friend and loyal customer, Hennessy, that an ‘Anglo-Saxon
is a German that’s forgot who was his parent and ‘They‘re
a lot iv thim in this country.’ Dooley also confides that
he is ‘wan iv the hottest Anglo-Saxons that iver come
out of Anglo-Saxony. Th’ name iv Dooley has been the proudest
Anglo-Saxon name in the County Roscommon f’r many years.’
(Green 1988: 34) Also, in The Decline of National
Feeling, Dooley claims that then President McKinley
(Mack), was a Scots-Irish who was becoming more anglicised
because he supported US/English connections. In the column,
Hennessy asks Mr. Dooley about his plans for St. Patrick’s
Day and he responds:
‘Well,
said Mr. Dooley, “I may cillybrate it an’ I may not. I’m
thinkin’ iv savin’ me enthusiasm f’r th’ queen’s birthday,
whiniver it is that blessd holiday comes ar-round. Ye
see, Hinnissy, Patrick’s Day is out iv fashion now. A
few years ago ye’d see the Prisident iv th’ United States
marchin’ down Pinnsylvanya Avnoo, with the green scarf
iv th’ Ancient Order on his shoulders an’ a shamrock in
his hat. Now what’s Mack doin’? He’s settin in his parlor,
writin’ letters to th’ queen, be hivins, askin’ after
her health. He was fr’m th’ north iv Ireland two years
ago, an’ not so far north ayether, - just far enough north
f’r to be on good terms with Derry an’ not far enough
to be bad friends with Limerick… (Filler 1962: 46-7)
Dunne
comments on way the colonisation of Irish culture makes
it part of English tradition. Dooley calls himself an
Anglo-Saxon and supplants the Catholic holiday of Saint
Patrick’s Day (which celebrates the person who brought
Christianity to Ireland) with the Queen’s birthday and
reminds his readers that many Irish in the US have become
“assimilated” into Anglo traditions.
The
Invasion of Puerto Rico
Even after the US had invaded Cuba and was preparing to
invade Puerto Rico, The World still dedicated
much of its coverage to linking the push for US involvement
in the Caribbean to an attempt by the English to increase
their influence. The headlines in the summer 1898 issues
attacked ‘Anglo’ ideas of hegemony more directly and supported
a more multicultural approach to defining ‘Americanness’
by emphasising the necessity for other Americans to fight
against Anglicisation. On 11 June they published an article
with the headline ‘Arrogance of the Anglomanic Gang’ which
offers an alternative definition to a single US identity.
What Binds Us as Nation is Not Community of Race,
But a Community of Interests, […] Of all the Races Here
That Which Calls Itself the Anglo-Saxon is the Only One
That Attempts to Force the Entire Nation into its Allegiance
[…] It seems strange that it should be necessary to call
attention to the fact that we are not a race, Anglo-Saxon,
Teutonic, Latin or Celtic, or any other but a nation made
up of many races.
The
article concludes with ideas about ways of defining US
citizens and warns against defining them by language or
race. The Irish-American emphasised a parallel
sentiment.
I
would remind this self-complaisant ‘Anglo-Saxon’: that
there are a good many countrymen of the young Emperor
of Germany in this country, and many more of this race
- All American citizens - who would have a word to say
in regard to a combination of the aforesaid ‘mother and
daughter’ against their fatherland. And then what about
the Irish and their kindred? And what of the Franco-American
element in our makeup, not to speak of the Russians, Scandinavians
and Italians, and last, though not least our colored brethren,
who owe their former condition of slavery to British colonial
institutions? (10 June 1898).
|