data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5c929/5c9296f0ed0b48b5a5dfb2c28ee192a0d668418c" alt=""
Carlos Gardel, tango
singer and Barça fan
Archivo General de la Nación
(José María Silva, 1933) |
The
new football season was not due to start until early
September, but FC Barcelona’s management board met in
emergency session to discuss the club’s future in the
midst of growing revolutionary fervour in the streets of
the city, with armed militias menacingly asserting their
control.
The
main concern of the directors of Barça
was that a rapidly deteriorating political and
economic climate would soon make it impossible to keep the
club running as a financially viable sporting entity.
While the club’s administrative offices were near the
city centre, its prime asset, the stadium on the
outskirts, was at the time in a less densely populated
neighbourhood and vulnerable to occupation by one of other
of the warring factions.
The
board voted to advise one of their star players, the
Uruguayan international Fernández, not to return from
holiday in Latin America
until further notice, and cancelled pending negotiations
with one of his fellow countrymen. Barça’s other foreign player, the Hungarian
Berkessy, was also taken off the books as a cost-saving exercise.
O’Connell was asked to stay and agreed.
The
board and the manager decided that the club would in the
short-term at least continue to play football in areas as
yet not caught up in full-scale fighting, pending
developments in the Spanish Civil War. This meant that the
club missed involvement in the suspended Primera Liga and restricted itself to some less important
competitions at regional level. The decision to adopt a
‘business as usual’ position was a gesture of faith in
Barça as an
enduring political and cultural entity. However, the fate
of the club was complicated by the fact that over the
years it had developed a reputation as a symbol of Catalan
pride and identity, opposed to the centralising tendencies
of Madrid. Prior to the outbreak of the Spanish Civil War, the
political tension had translated into rivalry on the pitch
between FC Barcelona and Real Madrid. This rivalry became
far more acute during the post-war years of the Franco
regime.
The
extent to which football was being subsumed into the
politics of
Spain
was clear from early on in the Spanish Civil War when FC
Barcelona’s president Sunyol was captured by pro-Franco
forces north of Madrid and shot. The precise circumstances of Sunyol’s death
remained a mystery throughout the Franco years. It was
only in 1996, on the sixtieth anniversary of his
disappearance, that the results of the first detailed
investigation into the death were published jointly by the
Catalan journalist Carles Llorens and two academics, José
María Solé and Antoni Strubell. Though Sunyol’s body
has never been found, the site of his summary execution
was located in a winding mountain road outside the town of
Guadarrama, which the politician had mistakenly believed was safely
in the hands of Republican forces. In fact the town had
been taken by the military insurgents. It seems he was
shot simply because his political beliefs were opposed to
Franco’s, although the symbolism of his presidency of FC
Barcelona would have been an additional incentive to have
him shot.
By
October 1937, Franco’s Spain had official control over some of the country’s best
known football clubs. They included Betis, Racing and Real
Oviedo, the three clubs that O’Connell had managed when Spain
was a Republic. In Madrid
and in Barcelona, the two major cities which remained resistant to the
military uprising, football struggled against the rising
tide of left-wing political militancy. Real Madrid’s right-wing president was forced into exile and the
club’s stadium in Chamartín was periodically
requisitioned for Soviet-style sports demonstrations.
Worried
lest they might meet with the same fate at the hands of
unruly anarchist militias, the surviving directors of FC
Barcelona set up a consultative workers’ committee aimed
at pre-empting any attempt at having its assets seized.
These were turbulent times and Barça struggled as best it could to keep afloat as a functioning
entity, organising games and keeping young players as
occupied as possible so that they would not be drafted to
the front.
Yet
during O’Connell’s first and only full season as
manager, the club faced the looming prospect of a
financial crisis, with gate receipts falling off and an
increasing number of club members not paying their dues.
While many Barça supporters
remained loyal to the club, they were too caught up in the
war politically, and had to prioritise their spending on
essential goods. There were other Catalans who were
politically sympathetic to the Franco cause, and were
averse to participating in an organisation ruled by a
workers’ committee, however much its founders found it a
convenient smoke screen to hide their independence.
What
is beyond doubt is that FC Barcelona’s survival as an
organisation became increasingly at risk because of
political developments beyond the stadium. By the middle
of
1937, in
scenes later vividly depicted by George Orwell in his Homage
to Catalonia, the city of Barcelona was submerged in an ideological struggle between
anarchists and Trotskyites on the one side and Stalinist
communists on the other. In such circumstances, officials
and players at FC Barcelona began to look towards the
future with a deepening sense of vertigo, caught up in a
political spiral that was out of their control.
Then,
suddenly, there came an unexpected lifeline, in the form
of an invitation from Manuel Mas Soriano, a Mexican
basketball-player-turned-entrepreneur. Soriano wanted FC
Barcelona to assemble its best team and send it to
Mexico on a tour of the country and of the USA. The deal was that the club would be paid US$15,000, a
considerable sum by contemporary values, with flights and
all other expenses covered separately.
To
the club’s committee, the players and O’Connell, the
deal seemed heaven-sent, the kind of lucky throw of the
dice that the Irishman had never lost his faith in from
his early days as a gambler. It not only offered a
temporary solution to the club’s cash-flow problems, but
also allowed its personnel to escape from a political
situation that could no longer guarantee their safety.
That the late Ángel Mur, the grounds man, managed to be
included in the trip was thanks to a mixture of good luck
and Irish humour, as he recalled in an interview with me
many years later.
Mur
told me how he had been on the pitch doing some gardening
duties when O’Connell approached him. At first
Mur
thought the Irishman had come to berate him about the poor
state of the turf. To his surprise, O’Connell told him
he wanted him on the Mexico/USA tour as the club’s
masseur had recently left. The fact that
Mur
knew nothing about medicine or therapy of any kind
appeared not to matter too much. O’Connell assured him
that he would teach him the basics. Mur
subsequently claimed that he learnt the rest from a couple
of books on anatomy on the human body that he picked up
from a local library. |