One
of the many clichés about the Irish presence in Spain relates
to the quality of the Irish as soldiers. This is taken as
explaining the uninterrupted presence of Irishmen in the
armies of the Spanish Monarchy from the beginning of the
seventeenth century to the start of the nineteenth.
Traditional historiography is replete with
nineteenth-century-style individual portraits of illustrious
Irish military figures (or those with Irish roots). When they
are discussed as a group, they are quickly assigned the
Romantic poetic categorisation of Wild
Geese. This literary metaphor has become laden with strong
ideological associations, almost all of these military and
nationalist. The Irish are seen as victims, antagonists (be it
Ireland versus England or Catholic versus Protestant), male
and of course always heroic (Remember Fontenoy!).
But
if the term Wild Geese
did in its day have some meaning, today it appears completely
out of date and reductive, faced as we are with a context so
rich and complex as that of Irish emigration during the modern
era. For not all Irish emigrants were soldiers, not all were
men, and not all achieved the honours and the integration that
they sought. In Spain they too were victims of marginalisation
and caricature. Even the aristocrats among them underwent a
process of integration and subsequent assimilation that was
not without its difficulties, or exempt from conflict with the
other ‘native’ elites of Spain. [1]
Officer
in Hibernia Regiment,
in typical red jacket and green sash,
late 18th century
(Bueno Correa 1986) |
This
is of course not to deny the Irish military tradition upon
which Bartlett and Jeffery reflected in the opening chapter of
A Military History of
Ireland. Nor is it my intention to take away one whit from
the merits and qualities that Irish soldiers demonstrated.
What I propose to show is that neither military tradition nor
merits were sufficient to account for the spectacular social
ascent of the Irish military in Spain. This article does not
propose to address other well-known factors such as religion,
the tradition of service to the crown, or a supposed common
ethnic origin. There is a need for a new theoretical framework
to supersede old models, such as for example the study of the
Irish solely in terms of their origin. To put it another way,
I believe that it makes sense when studying the Irish to bear
in mind the relations they established beyond the confines of
the socio-professional and the geographical
perspectives.
The
Irish provide us with a microcosm of internal machinations at
court, social advancement, relationships with other foreign
communities, as well as with the host society, and so on. In
this sense the Irish did not behave differently to anyone else
at the eighteenth-century court - the Basques, for example,
formed an extensive and complex network of relationships which
went beyond simple common origin. Of course this does not mean
that common origin was not an important element in group
cohesion, nor that it was not especially marked among the
Irish, although it was not the sole element. And, just like
other groups, the Irish also used other ‘parallel routes’
to get to the top, much at odds with what we would today
understand under the rubric of ‘meritocracy’. Money was
just one of these.
The
publication of F. Andújar Castillo’s work on venality in
the eighteenth-century army has justifiably caused a veritable
revolution in Spanish historiography. It has forced all of us
to think about the world of the military in an unconventional
way. [2] When it came to entry into the army and promotion
thereafter, money was as important as seniority or any other
distinction.
Often
hidden within the official documentation, the buying and
selling of positions in the military hierarchy was a practice
that already existed in the Spanish Army from the time of
Carlos V, and reached incredible proportions in the eighteenth
century. The various options for buying and selling in the
eighteenth-century army ranged from the classic ‘supply of
soldiers’ (in return for a promotion), to the mixed system
in which, as well as money, the supplier would receive jobs
for himself and his family as well as blank officer
commissions signed by the king. Of course there was also the
direct purchase of office, and in the second half of the
eighteenth Century even the provision of private finance for
construction works - either civil or military - was one means
of gaining access to the officer ranks.
The
Irish entered fully into this market, especially around the
middle of the seventeenth century. During the golden age of
the Irish levies, war was big business, especially for Irish
veterans of the armies of Flanders, Extremadura and Catalonia.
Whether or not these soldiers had been brought to Spain like
enslaved Africans was of little consequence once they found
themselves surrounded by money and positions in the officer
ranks. I will mention just a few cases here. Captain Cristóbal
Mayo brought 1,000 men from Ireland and with these he formed a
regiment under his command in Catalonia, ‘with the
privileges of Spaniards and on the same footing’. Mayo was
named commander of this regiment, the conditions being set out
before the levy arrived in Spain. Mayo received the title of maestre
de campo (commander of one or several regiments), allowing
him to head the regiment. In addition, he was assigned the
commissions for sergeant major, adjutant sergeant major,
adjutant, eleven captains, eleven ensigns and nine other
officer commissions, all ‘blank’ (AGS, GA,
Libro 209, ff. 162-163v. Madrid, 2 April 1650).
The
same thing happened in the case of the levy of 600 men raised
by Ricardo White in 1650. These were to form six companies of
100 men in each. The six commissions for captain (pay: 40
escudos per month) were given blank to White - or, which
amounted to the same thing, at his full discretion. He also
received blank commissions for six ensigns and six sergeants.
White imposed further conditions: note the king’s order to
the Corregidor
(Governor) of Biscay Province to admit White as a resident of
Bilbao ‘as long as he does not marry a woman from Biscay but
rather an Irishwoman and attends to the services he has
promised to render’. The service, of course was to raise 600
men for the army (AGS,
GA, Libro 209, ff. 198v-200v. In f. 200v. the order of Felipe
IV to Juan de Torres y Armendariz, governor of Vizcaya.
Madrid, 29 September 1650).
|